TSTP Solution File: SEV054^5 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SEV054^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:24:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.73s 3.90s
% Output : Proof 3.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEV054^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 03:16:10 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.73/3.90 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/3.90 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (Not
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (R : a → a → Prop) (U : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (R Xx Xy) (R Xy Xz) → R Xx Xz)
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → R Xz (U Xs)) (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → R Xk Xj) → R (U Xs) Xj)) →
% 3.73/3.90 ∀ (Xf : a → a), (∀ (Xx Xy : a), R Xx Xy → R (Xf Xx) (Xf Xy)) → Exists fun Xw => R (Xf Xw) Xw))
% 3.73/3.90 True
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (R : a → a → Prop) (U : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (R Xx Xy) (R Xy Xz) → R Xx Xz)
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → R Xz (U Xs)) (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → R Xk Xj) → R (U Xs) Xj)) →
% 3.73/3.90 ∀ (Xf : a → a), (∀ (Xx Xy : a), R Xx Xy → R (Xf Xx) (Xf Xy)) → Exists fun Xw => R (Xf Xw) Xw)
% 3.73/3.90 False
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (Not
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (U : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy) (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy Xz) → skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xz)
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → skS.0 0 a_1 Xz (U Xs))
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → skS.0 0 a_1 Xk Xj) → skS.0 0 a_1 (U Xs) Xj)) →
% 3.73/3.90 ∀ (Xf : a → a),
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xx Xy : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy → skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xx) (Xf Xy)) → Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xw) Xw))
% 3.73/3.90 True
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (U : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy) (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy Xz) → skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xz)
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → skS.0 0 a_1 Xz (U Xs))
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → skS.0 0 a_1 Xk Xj) → skS.0 0 a_1 (U Xs) Xj)) →
% 3.73/3.90 ∀ (Xf : a → a),
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xx Xy : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy → skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xx) (Xf Xy)) → Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xw) Xw)
% 3.73/3.90 False
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (Not
% 3.73/3.90 (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy) (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy Xz) → skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xz)
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → skS.0 0 a_1 Xz (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs))
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → skS.0 0 a_1 Xk Xj) → skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs) Xj)) →
% 3.73/3.90 ∀ (Xf : a → a),
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xx Xy : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy → skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xx) (Xf Xy)) → Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xw) Xw))
% 3.73/3.90 True
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy) (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy Xz) → skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xz)
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → skS.0 0 a_1 Xz (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs))
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → skS.0 0 a_1 Xk Xj) → skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs) Xj)) →
% 3.73/3.90 ∀ (Xf : a → a),
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xx Xy : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy → skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xx) (Xf Xy)) → Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xw) Xw)
% 3.73/3.90 False
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy) (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy Xz) → skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xz)
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → skS.0 0 a_1 Xz (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs))
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → skS.0 0 a_1 Xk Xj) → skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs) Xj)))
% 3.73/3.90 True
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xf : a → a),
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xx Xy : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy → skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xx) (Xf Xy)) → Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (Xf Xw) Xw)
% 3.73/3.90 False
% 3.73/3.90 Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.90 Eq
% 3.73/3.90 (∀ (Xs : a → Prop),
% 3.73/3.90 And (∀ (Xz : a), Xs Xz → skS.0 0 a_1 Xz (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs))
% 3.73/3.92 (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), Xs Xk → skS.0 0 a_1 Xk Xj) → skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xs) Xj))
% 3.73/3.92 True
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #10 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a → a → Prop) (a_3 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Eq
% 3.73/3.92 (And (∀ (Xz : a), a_1 Xz → skS.0 0 a_2 Xz (skS.0 1 a_2 a_3 a_1))
% 3.73/3.92 (∀ (Xj : a), (∀ (Xk : a), a_1 Xk → skS.0 0 a_2 Xk Xj) → skS.0 0 a_2 (skS.0 1 a_2 a_3 a_1) Xj))
% 3.73/3.92 True
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a → a → Prop) (a_3 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Eq (∀ (Xz : a), a_1 Xz → skS.0 0 a_2 Xz (skS.0 1 a_2 a_3 a_1)) True
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #51 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : a → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Eq
% 3.73/3.92 (Not
% 3.73/3.92 ((∀ (Xx Xy : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy → skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 Xx) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 Xy)) →
% 3.73/3.92 Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 Xw) Xw))
% 3.73/3.92 True
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #52 (by clausification #[51]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : a → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Eq
% 3.73/3.92 ((∀ (Xx Xy : a), skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy → skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 Xx) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 Xy)) →
% 3.73/3.92 Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 Xw) Xw)
% 3.73/3.92 False
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #54 (by clausification #[52]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : a → a), Eq (Exists fun Xw => skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 Xw) Xw) False
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #60 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a) (a_3 : a → a → Prop) (a_4 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Eq (a_1 a_2 → skS.0 0 a_3 a_2 (skS.0 1 a_3 a_4 a_1)) True
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #61 (by clausification #[60]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a) (a_3 : a → a → Prop) (a_4 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Or (Eq (a_1 a_2) False) (Eq (skS.0 0 a_3 a_2 (skS.0 1 a_3 a_4 a_1)) True)
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #73 (by clausification #[54]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : a → a) (a_3 : a), Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3) a_3) False
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #75 (by fluidSup #[73, 61]): ∀ (a_1 : Prop) (a_2 : a → a → Prop) (a_3 : a) (a_4 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Or (Eq ((fun _ => a_1) False) False) (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 1 a_2 a_4 fun x => a_1)) True)
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #83 (by betaEtaReduce #[75]): ∀ (a_1 : Prop) (a_2 : a → a → Prop) (a_3 : a) (a_4 : (a → Prop) → a),
% 3.73/3.92 Or (Eq a_1 False) (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 1 a_2 a_4 fun x => a_1)) True)
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #85 (by falseElim #[83]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : a) (a_3 : (a → Prop) → a), Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3 fun x => True)) True
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #93 (by superposition #[85, 73]): Eq True False
% 3.73/3.92 Clause #110 (by clausification #[93]): False
% 3.73/3.92 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------